<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Green Collar Technologies - Latest Comments in Better than Synthetic Photosynthesis?</title><link>http://sustain.disqus.com/</link><description>Green collar educational opportunities and research to help prepare Hawai`i for a sustainable future.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:51:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Better than Synthetic Photosynthesis?</title><link>http://greencollartech.com/solar-energy-breakthrough-photosynthesis.htm#comment-6570150</link><description>Now thats a first step to an affordable water solar battery.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Home Solar and Wind Power</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:51:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Better than Synthetic Photosynthesis?</title><link>http://greencollartech.com/solar-energy-breakthrough-photosynthesis.htm#comment-4073966</link><description>aloha John, you're right. although folks are having varying levels of&lt;br&gt;success with hydrogen power in general the folks at MIT seem to be onto&lt;br&gt;something new with these solar collection/storage devices. A search at&lt;br&gt;youtube for water for fuel also turns up some interesting videos. thanks for&lt;br&gt;the addition...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">greencollar</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:22:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Better than Synthetic Photosynthesis?</title><link>http://greencollartech.com/solar-energy-breakthrough-photosynthesis.htm#comment-4073507</link><description>I'm no scientist, but I'm sure I remember watching a program in the UK in about 1995 of a man who had created a car to run off hydrogen from water and I think he was doing the same thing. Just Googled it and it seems you can download it:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.torrentreactor.net/torrents/2026121/Equinox-It-Runs-on-Water-avi" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.torrentreactor.net/torrents/2026121/...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Green</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:45:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Better than Synthetic Photosynthesis?</title><link>http://greencollartech.com/solar-energy-breakthrough-photosynthesis.htm#comment-3721532</link><description>Aloha John, we completely agree. It seems there's no money is energy problems that are solved. Perhaps there's more money is energy problems rather than solutions? This is an amazing discovery as are many others...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">greencollar</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:19:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Better than Synthetic Photosynthesis?</title><link>http://greencollartech.com/solar-energy-breakthrough-photosynthesis.htm#comment-3720935</link><description>This discovery is certainly an important one.  It is sad that there is no mention of it in the media.  I wonder why.  As mentioned in the write up this dicovery or invention could be the reuseable energy source mankind has been looking for.  Several years ago I realized photosynthesis is the answer and thought if we could synthesis the firt stage of it we have endless source of energy.  The product that result for you process, hydrogen, is a very good source and easy to store.  Please let me know why there is not any mention of this in the media.&lt;br&gt;Thanks</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John shakib</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:43:29 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>